Is Texas About to Execute an Innocent Man? The David Leonard Wood Case Will Leave You Speechless

The clock is ticking. David Leonard Wood, a man who’s spent nearly 40 years on death row for the murders of six women in El Paso, Texas, is set to face execution. But here’s the kicker: he swears he’s innocent. And the evidence—or lack thereof—might just back him up. As the execution date looms, this case is blowing up into a full-blown controversy over justice, botched investigations, and the death penalty itself. Buckle up, because this story will make your blood boil and your mind race.

Wood’s case isn’t just about one man; it’s a glaring spotlight on a system that might be failing us all. From mishandled crime scenes to shaky witness testimonies, the cracks in this case are impossible to ignore. Could Texas be on the verge of executing an innocent man? Let’s dive into the chaos and see why this story deserves your attention—before it’s too late.

The Desert Killer… or a Scapegoat?

Back in the late ’80s, El Paso was rocked by the discovery of six women and girls buried in shallow desert graves. David Leonard Wood, dubbed the “Desert Killer,” was convicted in 1992 based on connections to the victims and a pile of circumstantial evidence. No DNA tied him directly to the crimes. No smoking gun. Just a narrative that stuck—until now.

Wood has screamed his innocence from day one. His defense team says the investigation was a mess: crime scenes were mishandled, evidence was ignored, and the prosecution leaned hard on jailhouse snitches who claimed Wood confessed. Sound fishy? It gets worse.

The Evidence That Could Change Everything

Here’s where it gets wild:

DNA Drama: Years after the trial, DNA testing on one victim’s clothing excluded Wood as a contributor. Yet Texas keeps slamming the door on more DNA tests—over 100 pieces of evidence are sitting untested. Why the rush to execute when the truth could be a lab result away?

Shady Witnesses: The case hinged on jailhouse informants who said Wood spilled the beans. Problem? These guys had every reason to lie—think deals for lighter sentences. Wood’s lawyer, Gregory W. Wiercioch, calls their testimonies “coerced” and “unreliable.”

Legal Fumbles: Wood’s original defense was a disaster, barely challenging the prosecution’s flimsy case. Now, Wiercioch is fighting tooth and nail with a habeas corpus petition, begging for a closer look at the evidence. So far? Crickets from the courts.

Why This Case Hits Different

This isn’t just about David Leonard Wood. It’s about a justice system that seems hell-bent on closing cases instead of finding the truth. Denying DNA tests to “avoid delays”? That’s not justice—that’s a cover-up. And when lives are on the line, we can’t afford to look the other way.